Not sure where your marketing budget is actually going? →
Get a free auditServices
Technical SEO
Technical SEO is the half of the job that decides whether anything else can work. If Google can't crawl a page, can't decide which version is canonical, or gives up waiting for it to load, the content on it is irrelevant. Most audits don't fail because they miss problems. They fail because they list four hundred of them without saying which THREE actually matter. Ours don't.

Real client results
Every campaign is judged on one number:
The revenue it puts in your account

What fixing the foundations can be worth
Crawl and index control, site speed, redirect hygiene and migration safety, delivered as a prioritised list rather than a 200 page PDF.
Three fixes, not four hundred
Findings come ordered by what they cost you, so the work starts where the money is rather than at the top of an export.
Migrations planned, not hoped
Every URL mapped and every redirect deliberate, because rebuilds are where most traffic disasters actually happen.
Written for developers
Findings are written so your own team can act on them without needing us to translate.
Strategic Momentum
Find out what's quietly capping your organic traffic
- Crawl and index control: what is indexed that should not be, what is missing that should be there, and where crawl budget is being wasted.
- Canonical and duplication logic, so authority stops splitting between several routes to the same content.
- Site speed measured against field data rather than a lab score, because a good number on a fast connection proves little.


Purposeful Innovation
What fixing the foundations can be worth
FAQ
The questions you actually want answered
What is the difference between an audit and ongoing technical work?
An audit is a one-off diagnosis with a prioritised list of fixes and their likely impact. Ongoing work is the implementation plus monitoring, because technical health degrades every time someone launches a template, adds a plugin or edits a form. Plenty of clients take the audit and do the work in-house, and that's fine by us.
Can our own developers do the fixes?
Yes, and often that's the sensible route because they know the codebase. We write findings so a developer can act on them without translation, and we'll happily join a call to answer questions. We don't need to hold the work to be useful.
How long does a technical audit take?
Usually one to two weeks depending on the size of the site, and most of that is verification rather than crawling. Anyone who sends you a report the next day has run a tool and exported it. That isn't the same thing as knowing what matters on your site.
Will a site rebuild damage our rankings?
Not if the migration is planned properly. Every URL mapped, every redirect single-hop and deliberate, the earning pages preserved, and Search Console watched for a month afterwards. Short-term fluctuation is normal. A permanent drop isn't acceptable, and it's almost always avoidable.
Do Core Web Vitals really matter for rankings?
They're a real but modest ranking factor, and a much larger conversion factor. We'd rather sell you speed work because slow pages lose sales, which is measurable, than on the promise of a ranking jump that may be marginal. Honest, even when it makes for a worse pitch.
Client reviews
Every review we have is five stars. Here's why.


